The final executive board of Sigma Phi Epsilon (from left: Yotam Bentov A17, Adrian Chu E16, Jacob Lebovic A18, Andre Chuong A18, Herluf Gyde Lund III E16, Shawn Patterson A17, Benjamin Kaplan A17, Matthew Masi-Phelps E17, Arman Smigielski A18 and Samuel Berzok A16) pose in front of their house at 92 Professors Row on Tuesday, Nov. 17, 2015, days before announcing their intention to disaffiliate from their national organization. (Evan Sayles / The Tufts Daily)

Tufts’ Sigma Phi Epsilon chapter disaffiliates from national organization

The Tufts Sigma Phi Epsilon (SigEp) chapter has voted to disaffiliate from its national organization due to a misalignment of goals and values with the national fraternity.

According to SigEp President Shawn Patterson and SigEp brother Ben Kaplan, the decision to disaffiliate was supported by 95 percent of the brothers in a Nov. 15 vote and comes after several months of structured discussions.

“We’ve been discussing how our fraternity fits into this campus [and] how our fraternity fits into our national organization, and…we came to the conclusion that in order to best serve the needs of the Tufts community, it would be best for us to become a local, independent organization,” Kaplan, a junior, said.

Kaplan explained that the decision to disaffiliate grew out of divergent values acknowledged by both the chapter and the national organization.

“We didn’t think that the needs, goals and values that SigEp was about fit what we were about anymore,” he said. “I just think there was a divergence, and I think both parties understood that — we understood that, SigEp understood that.”

Director of Fraternity and Sorority Life Su McGlone expressed the university’s support for the brothers.

“The university fully supports their decision and looks forward to working with them in their efforts as a local organization,” she told the Daily in an email.

Interfraternity Council (IFC) discussed the decision to disaffliate at yesterday’s meeting, SigEp brother Sam Berzok, a senior, told the Daily in an email. Berzok, who is the IFC recruitment chair, read a statement explaining why the chapter wished to leave its national organization. 

SigEp is the second Tufts fraternity to disaffiliate from its national organization this calendar year, following the decision by former brothers of Alpha Epsilon Pi (AEPi) – now Pi Delta – to break ties with the AEPi national organization in January.

While Kaplan and Patterson did not provide specific reasoning as to what needs, goals and values differed between the chapter and the national organization, Patterson did say that Tufts’ progressiveness may have contributed to SigEp and AEPi’s disaffiliations.

“Because no single fraternity on any campus is precisely ‘the average’ fraternity, any chapter across the country has to balance their relationship between their national organization and their campus,” Patterson, a junior, told the Daily in an email. “Tufts is a unique, progressive community and needs a unique, progressive approach to Greek life, which is perhaps why we have seen two disaffiliations in one year.”

Kaplan added that the disaffiliations can be attributed to the disconnect between national organizations and university chapters.

“I think every national fraternity has to kind of build themselves — so build their values, build their goals, build their programming, build what they do — around the ‘average’ American fraternity, and I don’t really know what that means — I don’t think really anybody knows what that means,” Kaplan said.

Tufts SigEp’s disaffiliation follows incidents of racism by SigEp chapters around the nation, including a UCLA chapter that co-hosted a “Kanye Western”-themed party in October, with costumes that embodied racial stereotypes and included blackface and a University of Mississippi chapter that was suspended in 2014 for hanging a noose and Georgia flag on the statue of the school’s first African-American student.

Kaplan said he believes that a new start for SigEp will further the brother’s efforts to address the problematic historical actions of fraternities on college campuses, citing a Nov. 16 article in Tufts’ PostScript Magazine which documented the racist acts of Tufts’ Delta Upsilon (DU) fraternity in 1975.

“In general, our national organization has been good at working against that,” he said. “In general, we think we have at least tried to recognize and work against that history, and we hope that this clean break toward something new, something Tufts-based, will make greater strides toward that end.”

Patterson explained that the brothers do not anticipate any backlash from the national organization. The national fraternity was aware that the chapter had been having structured discussions about disaffiliating, Kaplan added.

“We harbor no ill will towards our national organization, and they understand that we have put a great deal of thought into this decision,” Patterson said. “We expect that the process of disaffiliation will be civil, courteous and professional.”

Since the brothers have now gained approval from the IFC to become a local fraternity, the next steps for the brothers are to file for corporate status in Massachusetts and to obtain an appropriate insurance policy, according to Kaplan. Once those tasks have been accomplished, the fraternity will go through what he called the “rebuilding phase.”

“We kind of redefine ourselves from the ground up,” he said. “We find new letters, we articulate what we think we are as a brotherhood, we really try to redefine our place in the Tufts community.”

One potential feature of this rebuilding may be an all-gender membership policy, but this decision will not be an immediate one for the new organization, according to Kaplan.

“We’ve never really taken the all-gender option off the table — and I think it’s an important distinction between co-ed and all-gender,” he said. “Right now, we’re really just focusing on getting the support of the Greek community … filing for corporate status and trying to define our place on this campus.”

Patterson explained that the redefining process is already underway.

“We have established a number of committees to develop a new name, set new bylaws and determine our new place on this campus,” he said.

Kaplan expressed excitement for the currently undefined future of the brotherhood.

“The most immediate step for our brotherhood is really working out, now that we don’t have a national organization, ‘Who are we? Where do we fit in on this campus?'” he said. “And just restructuring ourselves to better reflect what we think we are. And I think the most exciting part of that question is that I really don’t know what the answer is.”


9 Responses

Leave a Reply
  1. Lisa Romeo Thompson
    Nov 19, 2015 - 03:44 PM

    The article cited about DU in 1975 is a bald-faced lie. I was there. It was a CAMPUS wide snowball fight. Many houses and dorms were involved and DU house was pelted too. There was no racial anything as proven by the fact no action was taken. And that picture is not even from the 70s let alone DU. When you people re write history you best stick to people who are dead and can’t rebut you.

    • Albino Squirrel
      Nov 20, 2015 - 09:44 AM

      The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

      • Lisa Romeo Thompson
        Nov 20, 2015 - 10:06 AM

        Wouldn’t you protest if you saw a lie? Or does the ends justify the means?

        • Albino Squirrel
          Nov 20, 2015 - 12:59 PM

          you blanket dismissal of ample evidence to the contrary belies your biased position. ridgefield is %96 white, that must comfort you.

          • Lisa Romeo Thompson
            Nov 20, 2015 - 01:47 PM

            What “ample evidence” is that? A letter to a student newspaper that was refuted? Is this journalism? Any attempt to get a primary source? The school investigated, decided it was a harmless snowball fight. What “evidence” anonymous squirrel? Your anonymity must be a comfort to you.

          • Albino Squirrel
            Nov 20, 2015 - 03:14 PM

            i count 4 primary sources in the linked source article (the other one you hollowly lambasted). And probation was levied, so obviously something untoward happened.

            Look, clearly you cannot be objective because these people were your (white) friends. It’s probably best not to associate yourself with them, because you look like a complete bigot in doing so.

  2. Jake G
    Nov 20, 2015 - 07:30 PM

    The thing they differ on is that Tufts chapter was one of the last remaining pledge-model chapters of SigEp and they were given until the end of December to either cease operations as a SigEp chapter or transition towards being a Balanced Man Chapter which runs on a four year development model rather than a pledge based model.

    • Hopkins_1869
      Nov 21, 2015 - 12:15 AM

      Jake G, thank you for this clarification. If indeed this is true (and I believe it is certainly plausible), then this would suggest the guys in SigEp took their action because they didn’t want to give up their “right” to haze their pledges. Sad, really. The guys I knew in SigEp when I was an undergrad at Tufts were better than this. And when they find out about this turn of events, I’m sure they’ll be pissed.

      • Little Lester
        Nov 21, 2015 - 11:05 AM

        Hopkins_1869, The chapter models are very different. Started in 1991, The Balance Man Program (BMP) was instituted as a means to redirect the focus of the fraternity as well as reduce and manage the risk for both the Chapter and the national organization. As with any new program, it was piloted as an option, then required of all new chapters, and now required of all chapters. I see benefits to both models. I was an active under the pledge system. Pledging can be a very positive experience if executed properly. The focus of my chapter was social then service, in that order. The BMP is more focused on self-improvement and service. I hope our former brothers find happiness in their new organization. I also hope that the national organization will recolonize Mass Zeta in the near future. HFF.

Related News