At meetings of the "Restoring Dignity in the Israel-Palestine Conversation," participants break up into small groups to share their opinions and practice communication skills. Alex Knapp / Tufts Daily

New Tufts Chaplaincy series seeks civil dialogue on Israeli-Palestinian conflict

While there are a number of on-campus groups that support different perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, there is not always a great deal of successful communication between them. “Restoring Dignity in the Israel-Palestine Conversation,” a new “third-space” conversation series sponsored by the Tufts University Chaplaincy, aims to open up the dialogue among students.

According to the series’ facilitators, the goal is not to give students a specific opinion on the conflict, but to allow them to express their ideas and listen to others in a welcoming space.

The program, which began on Sept. 16, runs for eight weeks, with participants and the two facilitators convening at the Interfaith Center every Tuesday from 6-8 p.m. 

“[The Chaplaincy] thought that students needed a third space for them to express their opinions regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,” Yousef Bashir, one of the facilitators, said.

Both of the series’ facilitators worked on promoting peaceful discourse regarding the conflict prior to coming to Tufts. Rebecca Polivy works with Encounter, an organization that aims to bring primarily American-Jewish leaders into face-to-face conversations with Palestineans. She is working as a facilitator alongside Bashir, a Palestinian from Gaza, whom she had previously heard speak.

Rabbi Summit [the Neubauer Executive Director of Tufts Hillel] got my name and then he reached out to me,” Polivy said. “I suggested we reach out to [Bashir] as well.”

Polivy and Bashir both bring a unique expertise to the series. Bashir, who is currently pursuing his Master’s Degree in conflict and coexistence at Brandeis, has previously spoken at a number of colleges across the United States.

“We have two incredible facilitators who are deeply invested and experienced, and also deeply knowledgeable” Noah Weinberg, a Tufts sophomore and participant in the series, said. “You don’t always find people like that who also want to work together.”

Students were selected to participate through an online application process. In the application, they were asked to share what interested them about the conversation series, as well as their religious or philosophical background.

“I think there is [a varied representation of opinions] based upon the applications that we got,” Polivy said.

Weinberg agreed, stressing the importance of participants whose views are not always represented in other conversations surrounding the issue.

“I would say that people represent a wide spectrum [of beliefs],” he said. “There [are] lots of people in the group that actually don’t usually engage in these kind of conversations … and don’t necessarily have strong opinions. Those are voices being heard that aren’t usually heard.”

According to Weinberg, however, there aren’t very many participants with more extreme viewpoints.

“While those voices are present, they’re in smaller numbers,” he said.

Weinberg also serves as a board member of the Tufts chapter of J Street U, an organization that advocates for American leadership in bringing about a two-state solution.

“On campus, I see our work as being very complimentary to what’s going on in this series,” he said. “We are trying to build an open, broad-based, inclusive, pragmatic and values-driven conversation about the conflict.”

Weinberg decided to get involved with the series per Summit’s suggestion.

“I feel that dialogue and this kind of conversation [are] very productive and important,” he said. “There’s a lot of polarization around this issue on campus … I wanted to encounter things that would challenge me.”

The series intends to provide a space for students to comfortably discuss the conflict, as well as listen to opposing viewpoints. In addition to providing a place for conversation, the facilitators are also aiming to promote listening skills.

“The first [meeting] was really about setting our communication guidelines and practicing what it means to really listen,” Polivy said.

According to Polivy, since there are close to 30 students attending the meetings, they split them up into small discussion groups.

“[The series] is very much based on the small group model … up to five [per group] at the most is our goal,” Polivy said.

According to Bashir, the students previously participated in name games and listening exercises during the meetings. In one meeting, they participated in an activity where they were given a statement and had to position themselves on a spectrum based on whether they agreed or disagreed with the statement.

“It’s pretty interesting to see [people] from the same identity have different approaches to the same idea,” Bashir said.

According to the chaplaincy website, the series will also include films, lectures and team-building activities.

Bashir hopes that students will continue to use the tools for listening and communication that they have learned even after the series is over.

“I hope that they think hard before they give up, and always expect that it’s going to be challenging … to ask questions and learn about others,” he said.

The lessons learned in the series are something that participants can carry with them into other clubs and student groups.

“I think that my work on campus is only going to be lifted up through this experience,” Weinberg said.


4 Responses

Leave a Reply
  1. Arafat
    Oct 09, 2014 - 08:22 AM

    In July 2012, enumerated several
    vital facts reflecting J Street’s consistently anti-Israel posture. These
    included the following:

    J Street’s political action committee (PAC) receives funds
    from the Saudi Arabian embassy’s attorney, Nancy Dutton.

    J Street receives more than $10,000 per year in
    contributions from Genevieve Lynch, a director of the National Iranian American
    Council, which is a pro-Iranian lobby.

    J Street’s PAC has received tens of thousands of dollars
    from one of the leaders of the Arab American community, Richard Abdoo.

    J Street’s PAC repeatedly took contributions from a Turkish
    American, Mehmet Celebi, who had helped produce Valley of the Wolves, a
    viciously anti-American and anti-Semitic Turkish film.

    J Street recently sponsored a speaking tour for John Ging,
    head of the Gaza-based UNRWA, an entity whose raison d’être is to perpetuate
    the Palestinian refugees’ status, thus encouraging their “right of return.”

    J Street’s visit to Israel in February 2010 was co-sponsored
    by an anti-Israel group called Churches for Peace in the Middle East, an
    organization which supports the boycott, divestment, & sanctions (BDS)
    efforts against Israel.

    Anti-Israel U.S. Arabists are attracted to J Street, sitting
    on its advisory board or contributing to J Street’s PAC. These include Ray
    Close, former CIA station chief in Saudi Arabia and then advisor to the head of
    Saudi intelligence; Lewis Elbinger, State Department foreign service officer;
    Nicole Shampaine, director of the State Department’s Office for Egypt and the
    Levant; Ted Kattouf, former ambassador to Syria and the United Arab Emirates;
    Robert Pelletreau, former ambassador to Egypt, Tunisia and Bahrain; and Philip
    Wilcox, former U.S. consul general in Jerusalem, and president of the Foundation
    for Middle East Peace.

    Daniel Levy (Jeremy Ben-Ami’s partner in founding J Street)
    stated at a conference in Abu Dhabi that “the creation of Israel” was “an act
    that was wrong.” Levy also defended the Goldstone Report, which was very
    critical of Israel’s 2009 military operation in Gaza.

    J Street welcomed BDS lobbyists to its national conference,
    where BDS ran a session on strategies and justifications for boycotting Israeli

    In January 2012, J Street in Jerusalem held a special
    meeting to honor Israeli soldiers who refused to obey the orders of their

    In March 2012, J Street lobbied the U.S. Congress against a
    resolution condemning the blatant incitement and anti-Semitism in Palestinian
    schoolbooks and the Palestinian media. Moreover, J Street refused comment on
    the Palestinian Authority’s school curriculum which openly promoted the violent
    struggle to “liberate” all of “Palestine.”


  1. For 2015, Wine With Everything

Related News