We the resigned culture reps would like to voice our opinions on
the importance of giving culture reps the full vote.
By not having a vote, we felt that our work was not valued and was unappreciated. In turn, we felt discouraged and frustrated, which resulted in our resignations.
Currently culture reps have the same voicing power as someone who speaks at open forum. Open forum is a time allotted at the beginning of Senate meetings for any member of the Tufts community to voice a particular concern. Essentially, culture reps have as much influence as any other member of the student body.
Senators are elected by the student body and their objective is to represent the entire student body. However, they represent the views and demands of the Caucasian straight community at Tufts and at large. In the average Senate meeting, minority issues are almost exclusively brought to attention by culture reps and those actively involved in CECA, the Culture, Ethnicity, and Community Affairs Committee.
A common argument against culture rep voting is the issue of double representation. However, this is not the case. The fact is senators represent their class, not their culture. Culture reps on the other hand represent their culture, not their class. Hence, the argument for double representation is invalid.
Policies are a reflection of a community's values and commitments. By not allowing culture reps a full vote, we are implying that the Tufts community is not fully committed to the issues and concerns of minorities on this campus.
We are asking you to take into consideration how the administration and the student body take into account issues facing the minority community and diversification. Please come and show your support by coming out to vote 'Yes' on the amendment on April 25th.
Tracy Bulter
Kat Cheung
Anabella Nieves
